Andrew McMillan, Politician | Elections 2011

By: Mcmillan  06-Dec-2011
Keywords: Media Coverage, Electorate Candidate

The 2011 General Election has seen the return to Parliament of New Zealand First and their charming yet enigmatic leader, Winston Peters. This followed a disappointing 2008 election where the party failed to gain the 5% threshold, coming in with 4.07%, and Peters being hammered in Tauranga by Simon Bridges, who enjoyed a 11,742 vote majority over Peters.

With Peters standing as a List only candidate for this election, arguably the party's next highest profile candidate, former TVNZ weather presenter Brendan Horan was given the nod to stand in Tauranga. This enabled Peters to concentrate on the party vote, which was realistically the only way they would make Parliament.

Peters has always had a nous for seizing an opportunity, and when Prime Minister John Key and Act's Epsom Candidate made an absolute shambles of their cup-of-tea media stunt, Peters pounced on the opportunity to make hay. It proved a good harvest for Peters, who maintained media coverage throughout the penultimate week of the campaign. Never mind that Peters initially decried the taping as an illegal "News of the World" type stunt, once he allegedly had his hands on a transcript of the taping, there was no stopping him and his Party's progress to Parliament.

On election night they ended with 6.81% of the party vote, entitling them to 8 seats in the house.

So let's take a look at where New Zealand First's resurgent support came from. Note that the following analysis is based 2008 data and preliminary results from the 2011 election.

Biggest Party Vote by Electorate

Rank Electorate Candidate Party (%) Change
1 Tauranga HORAN, Brendan 15.41 n/c
2 Bay of Plenty DOLMAN, Raymond 12.94 n/c
3 Waiariki   11.37 n/c
4 Coromandel STONE, Kevin 11.26 +3
5 Tamaki Makaurau   11.01 +4
6 Rotorua TABUTEAU, Fletcher H 10.86 n/c
7 Te Tai Tokerau   10.38 -3
8 Hauraki-Waikato   10.32 +6
9 Northland   10.27 -4
10 Whangarei PARAONE, Pita 9.77 -2

Little has changed in NZ First's support base from 2008, with Tauranga and the Bay of Plenty region showing strong support for Peters. The other point to note, is even though Peters refuses to stand candidates in the Maori seats, the party still maintains strong support from them.

Keywords: Electorate Candidate, Media Coverage,

Other products and services from Mcmillan


Andrew McMillan, Politician | Green Party

The Greens had a fantastic election, improving on last election's 6.72% and nine seats in the house to breaking the ten precent barrier this election with 10.62%, giving them 13 MP's in the house. Wellington Central generally had a very low voter turnout, but with the help of James Shaw, they increased the party vote from 20.62% when Sue Kedgley stood in 2008 to 26.47% this election.


Andrew McMillan, Politician | Act Party

Nationally Act went from 3.65% of the party vote and five seats in Parliament following the 2008 election, to just 1.07% and only the one seat in Parliament following the current election. With Banks on the ropes, Prime Minister John Key joined him for the infamous cup of tea, to give National supporters in Epsom the message to vote for Banks.


Andrew McMillan, Politician | United Future

I'd suggest that the two main causes of this were the lack mainstream media coverage (the teapot saga didn't help here) along with polling showing Dunne was going to struggle to retain his seat. Peter Dunne did well to retain his Ohariu seat but the party failed to gain momentum leading into the election. In 2008, United Future gained around 20,000 party votes, which was around 0.9% of the party votes cast. Biggest Party Vote by Electorate.


Andrew McMillan, Politician | Agriculture

I find this a bit rich from a Candidate who’s prepared to champion policy that we know will have a real and detrimental effect on our agricultural industry. In Julian Blanchard’s (Labour Candidate for Rangitata) letter on fracking, he asserts that our region relies almost solely on the agriculture industry. Blanchard suggests that we need better information before fracking should be allowed to proceed in our region.